Which of the following would be considered a reasonable accommodation of an apartment building's policy?

A reasonable accommodation under fair housing laws typically involves modifying specific rules or policies to offer individuals with disabilities equal access to housing and services. Allowing a veteran with a documented need for an assistance animal to bypass a no pet policy is a prime example of this principle in action. Such accommodations are designed to enable individuals to fully utilize their living spaces and address their particular needs, particularly when those needs are linked to disabilities as recognized by law.

In this context, raising rent for all tenants does not accommodate individual needs and could unfairly burden all tenants regardless of their circumstances. Similarly, allowing additional pets for all tenants does not specifically address the needs of individuals with disabilities nor is it tailored to assist those who may require particular support animals. Implementing a new pet policy purely for financial gain lacks the underlying intention of providing equal access and does not consider the needs of tenants with disabilities.

Thus, option C stands out as a legitimate and necessary adjustment that aligns with the spirit and legal requirements of fair housing, ensuring that the rights and needs of individuals with disabilities are honored.